Accenture Webinar Follow-Up: Q&A with Tom Barfield (Part 2)
In our recent webinar with Tom Barfield of Accenture, he explored how the company takes a comprehensive hire-to-retire approach for capability development through social learning. In Part 1 of this blog we summarized the viewers’ answers to the question “what imperatives or challenges are causing you to consider a social approach?”
In Part 2 of this blog, Tom graciously took the time to answer many of the remaining questions we did not get to during the live webinar. Here they are by category:
Adoption
Q: How do you define connect, contribute, and cultivate from a measurement perspective? And can you share specifically how you would put people into the 3C categories?
Tom: The table below summarizes the metrics that are aligned to each of the three C’s. Each person receives a total score which is made up of a possible 100 points for each of the C’s. Any one metric may be worth 10-30 points.
| Connect | Contribute | Cultivate |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribe to e-mail digest | Contribution posted to KX as contact | Respond to Discussion |
| Download content in the KX | Post Discussion Question | Comment microblog, contribution, video, blog, idea |
| Vote Idea (KX or Grapevine) | Create Blog | Edit Wiki |
| Member of a Community | Create Microblog | |
| Rate | Create Idea (KX or Grapevine) | |
| Complete People Profile - bio, photo, additional skills | Create Wiki | |
| Visit an Assets tab | Create Bookmarks | |
| Visit one.accenture.com | Download of content on the KX by others | |
| Blogs viewed by others |
Q: What period of time is used to measure the 3 c's (a month, week, quarter?) How often do I need to contribute to be counted as such?
Tom: Today we run our scoring process after each quarter. Most elements are based on activity during the quarter, but there are some exceptions. For instance, in Connect, if you complete your profile and subscribe to the email digest once, you will automatically continue to receive points in the future.
Q: How do you address the fear factor (e.g., where someone sits on a painful lesson learned rather than publicizing it for all to learn from)?
Tom: An excellent question – and one I admit we haven’t completely solved. From a learning perspective failure has much to teach. I don’t expect that our people proactively share their lessons learned - individually. I do see more of that openness, however, in responses to questions (ex. “I tried this approach and it didn’t work”). I think we do a better job at capturing lessons learned more formally through our offering owners – who are responsible for specific solutions. As we implement these solutions we are able to learn from our mistakes which are then baked back into our offerings for future delivery.
Another type of fear factor can come from general sharing. There can be a hesitancy to share because of a belief that their point-of-view or insight needs to be perfect. One of the ways we try to address this is by encouraging our leaders to be natural in their communication style – lose the formality, spelling mistakes are OK. We also encourage our leaders to engage in conversations – even if it is simply saying “Thank you” - to a post that was made.
Management
Q: Do you still find the need to have a "librarian" to manage taxonomy, tagging, and findability of the data? Or are you 100% organic in terms of management of the knowledge?
Tom: The Social Learning team I lead is responsible for providing taxonomy management governance; interestingly we have just started an internal debate on my team about the value of taxonomy vs. folksonomy (I believe both have a place in our world). The main purpose of taxonomy and tagging is of course to help improve the findability of content.
From a content perspective our biggest challenge continues to be search quality. In this past year we have formed a small Search Center of Excellence team whose sole responsibility is identifying and implementing approaches to improve search quality. This can be through search relevancy tuning or improvements to managing our content. I expect that we will start seeing the fruit from this team’s work in the next month or so.
Q: What is the curation overhead? Do you invest in resources directly or expect the end users to do this work?
Tom: We have a central team who are located primarily in India that helps us with the management of content, metrics, and site maintenance. We are also in the process of expanding the responsibility of this team to include community management. Approximately 70% of the content that is contributed is harvested from our client teams vs. posted by end users. We focus our content harvesting on the most strategic content areas where content gaps have been identified.
Technical
Q: Are you using any product for gamification? Or is it custom software?
Tom: We plan to use the Spotlight module provided in NewsGator Social Sites.
Q: Do you use FAST for SharePoint for search?
Tom: Yes
Q: The e-mail into a community to post a question is interesting. How is that enabled?
Tom: This is native functionality included in NewsGator Social Sites. Questions or insights that are posted with #hashtags cause the system to identify any community or users following those #hashtags and routes the question/insight to those communities and individuals.
Rollout
Q: Can you talk more about the integration between social learning and formal learning programs?
Tom: There are several areas of integration:
- Organization – We have an organization known as Capability Development responsible for working with areas of our business to understand their skill and knowledge needs. Based on these needs, Capability Development will develop a strategy to meet the performance goals. This strategy incorporates a combination of formal and social learning approaches.
- Governance – Members of Capability Development (including the Chief Learning Officer) are a primary component of the Social Learning Steering Team that I lead which helps me set the vision and priorities for our social learning investments.
- Technology/Innovation – While our Social Learning system (called Knowledge Exchange) and our Learning Management System (myLearning) are separate technology infrastructures, the teams driving these systems work together in developing the visions and requirements of each system.
Q: Do you find it works best to organize groups/communities around skill sets (e.g., project management) or industry sectors or product offerings?
Tom: Yes, yes, and yes. Those are all examples of categories of communities that are provided. I wouldn’t say that one is better than the other. Our main categories of communities are Industry (ex. Banking), Business Function (ex. CRM, Strategy), Technology (ex. Testing, Technical Architecture) and Offering. We also have informal social communities (ex. Running, Gamers).
Thank you Tom for taking the time to answers these great questions submitted by our webinar viewers! Again, if you missed the webinar, you can watch the on-demand version anytime.
As you can tell Accenture has a quite impressive and innovative social strategy where they invest heavily in making sure their employees benefit from social tools like Microsoft SharePoint and NewsGator Social Sites. To find out more about how NewsGator can guide you in the right “social” direction, contact us today!

JB Holston, President and CEO
Laura Farrelly, VP of Microsoft Alliance
Brian Kellner, VP of Products
Melissa Risteff, SVP of Marketing & Corporate Development
Eric Sauve,